Skip to main content

some saturday thoughts…

it’s saturday afternoon and I’m feeling particularly contemplative. partly, a brief conversation with a practical stranger sparked some thoughts swirling in my head. partly, I just tend to be that way.  sure, there is work I could be doing… dusting, sweeping, changing beds, etc… but I’m going to sit here and think out of my keyboard. this will probably wind up being way ramble-y, and brutally honest to the point of discomfort… I don’t know. we’ll see where it goes…

  1. my family is not ‘normal’. I know what you’re all thinking… that’s a given, right? no family is normal, we’re all unique, there’s no such thing as normal, abnormalcy is hereditary so what do I expect… yeah yeah. that’s not what I mean. my nuclear family is not quite nuclear. I know that’s kind of the norm these days, with divorce and remarriage and step-kids and half-kids and such. wait. that sounded funny. not half-KIDS. the kids are whole… the siblings are half. you know what I mean. families are all different, it seems, and different is the new normal. but here’s the thing. my family looks normal, aside from the fact that it’s not. most people who know us somewhat well, know that shane is not dave’s biological child. he was 5 when dave and I got married. shortly thereafter, we had two children together. most people who meet us now, assume that we are ‘normal’. they would have little reason not to. the kids all kinda look alike. they all have light-ish hair and brown eyes. quite honestly, they all look more like dave than they do like me. even shane. he calls him ‘dad’. he goes by his last name, although legally it’s not. the dynamic in all of this is a bit odd. dave is very much a ‘stepdad’, although that’s not a word we ever use or the feel we want to go for, and it’s not like dave replaced anyone. you see there is no real dad to be the oppositional counterpart to the stepdad. well, obviously there was such a person at one time, but that person only exists in bad memories and 50% of my son’s DNA. for all practical purposes, he does not exist. but that still does not remove the fact that remove that dave is NOT that person. in our normal, day to day lives, this is not really an issue. well, I suppose it might be, if you ask dave or shane, but from my perspective as the common denominator, it’s just my life. it’s what it is. it’s who we are. the end. the only time it is an issue is when we, for whatever reason, have to address it with people. provide explanations, etc. it feels weird, awkward. not because we feel weird or awkward about it, or even because other people act weird or awkward about it, it’s just because most days, it’s one of those ignored facts of our life. it is what it is, and we don’t talk about it a ton. I don’t know. maybe we should? for now, we just live.
  2. “I’m adopted”. unrelated to the first thought. some people know this about me, others don’t. I am adopted. or, as I’ve taken to saying in recent years, I was adopted. I’m not sure why, but something about the ‘am’ sounds funny to me. like if I say I am female. I am christian. I am american. it’s like a constant, perpetual state of being. adopted just seems like an odd state to perpetually be in. it happened once. when I was born. and although it has probably affected every single aspect of my life, being, and personality in one way or another, I don’t like the feel of it. it sounds more like a label than a part of my history. having been adopted is not a huge deal to me. partly, I assume, because it happened when I was an infant. I was always going to be adopted. it’s not like I had a family and something happened to them and then I was adopted. I was my parents’ child from the start. when I was younger, unless people knew my family situation already, they probably wouldn’t have suspected that I was not my parents’ biological child. I don’t look unlike my parents enough to stand out as an obviously adopted child. they are white, I am white. my dad has dark hair, as do i. they both have light eyes, whereas mine are brown, but it’s not unheard of… brown eyes are dominant, you know. it became a tad more apparent when I got to be in about junior high and it became clear that I was… well… short. really short. if you have never met my parents, this means nothing to you. let me fill you in. my mom is 6 feet tall. my dad is 6 foot 9. this scenario led to some interesting situations. there was the time that, at the age of 16, I went to a restaurant with my parents and the waitress gave me a children’s menu and crayons. there has been more than one occasion where I would introduce people to my parents and they would look at them, dumbfounded, look back at me, and then ask eloquently, “what happened to you?” true story. when the whole adopted thing is explained to people, I get a variety of reactions. most people are like, OOHHH! and the lights come on and it all suddenly makes sense. other people, who obviously are uncomfortable or think that I am, for some reason, get all awkward and apologetic, like they brought up a topic they shouldn’t have. when I was younger, I would get a lot of questions that I thought were VERY strange; how old were you when you were adopted? did you live in an orphanage? did you know your real mom? were you abandoned? stuff like that. as a kid, I didn’t really know there was the option to adopt something other than a baby, and I just figured they’d seen ‘annie’ too many times. but for me, it was just a fact of life.
  3. and so? I’m going to ask the good lutheran question here: what does this mean? I have no idea. these are just things that are in my head today. there is a connection though. in similar fashion to the way we feel kinda odd when we have to discuss with strangers about the dave and shane situation, it felt odd discussion my status as an adopted child. it was not something that was obvious and therefore was hardly ever discussed. it was just the way things were. we knew it, but we didn’t need to talk about it all the time. I wonder about how different it would be if it came up ALL the time. would it be annoying? would it be less awkward than it is for me, because you just get used to it? international adoptions are such a huge thing right now that it seems like that is the picture people get in their heads when they think of an adopted child. you know, the stereotypical white family with the obviously chinese daughter. I just wonder how many people are out there like me and my parents, or like shane and dave. you know? you never really think about it because unless someone looks drastically different than their parents or siblings, you just assume they are biologically related. I suppose it’s less than relevant, and I’ve wasted enough time contemplating this.
  4. at any rate. I commend my husband. not everyone is willing to jump in and raise a kid that isn’t your own. I commend my parents… well, because they’re my parents and I like them. I commend adoptive parents, both those whose children are obviously adopted, and those for whom it is less than apparent to the casual observer. parenting is a hard job your kid pops out of your own body and you are with them from day one. I can’t begin to imagine how that dynamic changes and the different challenges that come with an adopted child.
  5. having been adopted myself, and having my own biological children already, would I ever consider adopting? that’s a good question. probably. I have to say that it’s not like I feel ‘called’ to do so. I have not had a ‘burden’ for foster children or orphans placed on my heart. at least not at this point in my life. I don’t know that that is something that is always there for people, though. I suppose it develops as a result of an experience or just something God gives you at the time when you are ready for it. so I can’t say that I’ll never feel that way. I also have obviously not had trouble in the fertility department. I have children. 3 of them. they are great. I don’t need more children. however, should God see fit to bless me with the task of being mother to other children in the future, I will not refuse.
  6. reading over this, I think it sounds like I have cast a somewhat negative light on adoption in general or being adopted. I’ve used words like ‘real’ and ‘biological’ and I hope no one takes that the wrong way. I don’t mean it like that, and really don’t consider myself to be somehow ‘less’ than my parents’ child than I would be if I were biologically theirs, even if what I have written makes it sound that way. sometimes written language can be so limiting. I feel lacking in my ability to make this sound the way I want it to. I feel like I’m generalizing or making assumptions and maybe I am. I don’t know. it is my hope that no one will feel confused or offended by what I’ve written.

so there it is, I guess. excuse my typically long-winded ramble and invented punctuation rules. those are my saturday thoughts. well, a few of them at least.

Comments

you may like...

for my not-so-american friends

i didn't have an actual roll w/ the green plaid on it, but i found a refill and an empty roll in my junk drawer (yeah, i know, that should tell me something).  but even the empty one says 'scotch' on it.  there you go!  SCOTCH TAPE!

i have "done something"

about shane's room. if you notice over there on my BIG FAT TO DO LIST, for ages now, i've had "do something about shane's room" on the list. and it has sat there on the list, doing nothing.  well yesterday, we "did something". i couldn't put "clean shane's room".  that wouldn't really cover it.  i wasn't sure exactly how to phrase what is was that needed to be done in there, mainly because i don't really know the proper grammatical term for "set off 4 sticks of dynamite followed by much jackhammering and industrial vacuuming".  needless to say, it was a pit! every saturday, one of his chores is to clean his room.  but at this point, that was just putting clothes in the basket, books on the shelf, toys in bins, etc.  anything else was WAY too big of an undertaking for a 9 year old boy on his way out the door. sadly, i didn't think to take a 'before' picture, so i didn't bother with an '

first day of school

so, we started school today. this is a big deal because it is OUR first day of official homeschooling. you know, here. at home. most everyone reading this is already aware of the fact that shane has been homeschooled since first grade, but that he has spent the majority of that ‘school’ time, with my mother as his ‘teacher’. this was a fine arrangement, she was willing and more than qualified, and he was learning. but for a variety of reasons, not the least of which being my mother’s current cancer issues, it had become clear that it was time for me to take over. AND,with layla being 4 now, i really wanted to do a little bit more preschool stuff with her. being a little bit of a chicken flake, i (with much urging from my loving husband) decided the best route to go would be with a packaged curriculum. i figured it would be the most time-effective way to cover what we needed to cover, and be somewhat dummy-proof, but at the same time, having the option to supplement with as much

does home ec even exist anymore?

my last post got me thinking about how i somehow missed 'learning' all of those things which are essential in running a successful home. i'm wondering who dropped the ball on this (because, i can't possibly take responsibility for my own shortcomings here). i guess traditionally, one learns these things from their parents. i suppose i did learn a lot of my domestic skills at home. for example, the husband is supposed to eat the leftovers in the fridge. when making a bed, the 'top' of the top sheet goes down so that when you fold the edge over the blanket, the 'top' side is then up. why this matters when you are just going to cover the whole thing with a pillow and comforter is totally beyond me. but that's how you do it. so yes, my mother taught me how to iron, do laundry, clean a toilet, etc. my dad taught me how to plant a garden, mow a lawn, appreciate baseball, etc. and then there's home ec. do people still take home ec? i took it

junk drawer challenge 2008!

if you're anything like me, you have one of these: yeah, that WAS my junk drawer.  it's ridiculous.  it was getting to the point where you couldn't even close it.  instead of the "junk drawer" i think it should really be called the "don't know what to do with it or too lazy to put it where it really goes drawer".  so i decided to document exactly how ridiculous it really was. this is all the stuff laid out on the kitchen counter: so what is all this stuff?     here we have a dozen or so rubber bands and used twisty ties, a stamp pad from a hand/foot print kit we got when micah was born, 4 used birthday candles, and a pack of spare buttons from some pants.   a bunch of batteries and a bunch of cord-type things. instruction booklets and a bunch of writing utensils... although upon closer examination, the red one in the middle is actually a tinker toy! a bunch of the little packages of 'hardware' that comes with stuff - notice th